Are Americans really generous? And what will that look like tomorrow?
Of that $241 billion, over 30% goes to churches.
The number was 57% a decade ago. Why is the number so high, and why has it dropped? It’s high because two of the biggest factors in motivating behavior are a shared social expectation and making it public, according to Penn professor Jonah Berger.
Historically, the church has been very clear about an expectation that Christians tithe. They give 10% of their income to the church. That’s what they do; it’s not that they should, or we wish they would–it’s part of the identity. Period. And that tithing has been public; they pass the plate every week and you can see the people around you doing it (who in turn can see you not doing it).
From what I’ve seen, you can attribute the decline in church giving percentage pretty directly to two things; a decline in shared social expectations about what it means to be a member of this particular faith (with the individualization and commodification of the religion), and a decline in the significance of church in the life of even the average churchgoer (let alone the average American).
While this raises one set of questions for pastors about how to fund churches (John Dickerson’s recent book “The Great Evangelical Recession” goes into those), it also raises another set for ordinary people–as they think about the causes that matter to them, how can they build shared social and public expectations about giving, and to what should they be directed?
Sacrificial giving is in decline.
It’s not that people have stopped caring, but no single institution has the kind of hold on them the church used to have. Since nobody has stepped into the church’s void in a consistent way, creating a shared social ethic of sacrificial giving (10% is a lot of money!), nonprofits that don’t step up their efforts to attract and retain people in their 40s and 20s are likely to have budget problems in the near future.
The last generation that had an ethic of sacrificial giving will only be giving for so much longer. That said, this isn’t an irreversible trend–for example, households with incomes under $100k upped their giving (as percentage of income) in the last few years. The total dollar amount change wasn’t significant since the recession lowered actual incomes, but it suggests people are still willing to be generous if given good reasons. Different things are considered to be the causes every decent person should give to (education giving is way up from a few years ago, instead of church)–and that’s a communications opportunity for organizations willing to work together to drive interest in their mission area. City downtowns have figured out that everybody benefits when they market as a group; nonprofits could learn a thing or two from them.
Models for giving are changing.
More people want to give time and talent; skilled volunteerism is up, as is volunteerism in general. Online giving has been rising very steadily the last few years. Finally, the rising generations don’t have the same unquestioning acceptance of big institutions their parents and grandparents did–institutional loyalty is way down.
But “giving” itself also has a wider range of meanings. Many young people still give small amounts (see above) as budgets are tight, but as that changes and they think about how to improve the world, the options are more complex than setting aside a tithing budget. Does extra income go into donating to a nonprofit? Investing in a social startup? Eating more organic and local food? Entertaining more and improving the lives of those around us?
What can we as individuals do to make the world a better place, and what role do organizations play in that?